Your margin is made in the phone room.
Interview depth without the cost base underneath it. WTN runs the conversation in the respondent’s own language, structures what they said, and hands you export-ready data — under your own brand, on your own timeline.
The economics
More interviews per rupee, at interview depth
Telephone interviewing gives you depth and costs you a phone room. Online panels give you scale and lose the depth. A voice conversation that runs itself keeps the depth and removes the room — at a fraction of traditional fieldwork cost.
Depth, at scale.
The agent probes, asks the follow-up, and keeps a wandering respondent on the schedule — the part a form cannot do and a phone room does expensively.
Fieldwork in hours, not weeks.
Waves run in parallel across languages instead of queueing behind interviewer availability. You watch completion fill on a dashboard rather than chasing a call sheet.
You pay for valid responses, not attempts.
Hard rules decide what counts: consent given, enough time on task, enough of the mandatory questions covered, and no duplicate person or device. An attempt that fails them is not billed as a response.
Your logo
Fieldwork that goes out under your brand
Respondents see your agency, on the invitation and on the page they answer. WTN’s attribution — a small line saying the conversation runs on WTN — stays visible alongside it. That is a product rule, not a plan setting.
Behind your product
Run WTN as your fieldwork engine
If you already have a client portal, WTN does not need to be a second one. The API and signed webhooks let the whole cycle — brief, dispatch, monitor, collect — happen inside your own product.
Partner API and signed webhooks.
Create studies, dispatch waves and pull structured results from your own stack. Every action the client portal offers is callable through the API — that is a platform rule here, not a roadmap item.
Export-ready data, with the methodology attached.
Structured answers per question, plus the block your client’s research team will ask for: sample source, field dates, contacted, valid and rejected counts, language and channel mix, completion rate and known bias.
The verbatim survives the summary.
Structured themes sit on top of what the person actually said, in their own words, so a debrief can go back to the quote instead of arguing about the chart.
Every report carries its own methodology block, and the line that goes with it: findings are directional only unless quota controls were applied and met. DPDP-aligned: consent receipts, erasure, and storage in India. Complaint workflows aligned with ISO 10002 for agencies running grievance work for a client.